Executive assurance over critical services, dependencies
and recovery confidence.
A recovery plan is useful only if leadership understands which services matter, what they depend on and what the available evidence says about recovery.
I examine critical services, technology and supplier dependencies, continuity arrangements, exercise findings and recovery evidence. My experience includes executive responsibility for operational resilience alongside global technology and cyber security leadership. See the career examples.
WHEN THIS ASSIGNMENT IS USEFUL
What could interrupt the services that matter?
SCOPE
What the review covers.
OUTPUT
Decision-ready executive assurance.
What you receive
A view of material service dependencies, recovery assumptions, gaps in evidence and the governance decisions required; with prioritised recommendations for testing, ownership and remediation.
The review distinguishes demonstrated capability from untested expectations. It does not promise recovery performance that has not been evidenced. Scope, participants, deliverables and fees are agreed upfront.
Engagement basis
✓ Defined scope
✓ Agreed evidence base
✓ Executive findings
✓ Prioritised recommendations
NEED ONGOING OWNERSHIP INSTEAD?
If the findings call for continuing executive ownership, we can discuss a leadership mandate. If your leaders retain ownership and need challenge on the next decision, advisory may fit.
Discuss the review you need. Bring the decision, deadline and the evidence available.
Commissioning the review
We establish the question, the evidence and access available, and who needs the findings. I then confirm whether the review can be supported and propose the agreed work, timing and fee.
